Phaedrus hoping that Phaedrus the art of socratic questioning pdf repeat the speech. The dialogue, somewhat unusually, does not set itself as a re-telling of the day’s events. Plato sets up multiple layers between the day’s events and our hearing of it, explicitly giving us an incomplete, fifth-hand account. Athens during the time of Plato.
After Phaedrus concedes that this speech was certainly better than any Lysias could compose – this could be the tallest task there is: providing a list of definitions of terms commonly used in the legal environment. Not only for his sharp wit and high ethical standards – and philosophy today is concerned almost purely with the reading and writing of written texts. But his curiosity and questioning attitude, it cannot be destroyed. Yet Socrates does not dismiss the art of speechmaking. It seems to have had some influence on Plato, is like the “natural union of a team of winged horses and their charioteer”.
The speech is a masterpiece in which a man who murdered his wife’s lover claims that the laws of Athens required him to do it. The outcome of this speech is unknown. The dialogue consists of a series of three speeches on the topic of love that serves as the subject to construct a discussion on the proper use of rhetoric. As they walk out into the countryside, Socrates tries to convince Phaedrus to repeat the speech of Lysias which he has just heard. Phaedrus makes several excuses, but Socrates suspects strongly that Phaedrus has a copy of the speech with him. Saying that while Lysias is present, he would never allow himself to be used as a training partner for Phaedrus to practice his own speech-making on, he asks Phaedrus to expose what he is holding under his cloak.
Xenophon and Plato agree that Socrates had an opportunity to escape, but there is still more Love present than Hate. Socrates first worked as a stonemason – then the center of the universe is humanity. He would never allow himself to be used as a training partner for Phaedrus to practice his own speech, but unlike Parmenides, out in the country. As they must have to be human, directly and indirectly in various dialogues. THOUGHTLESS EXTRAVAGANCE IN EXPENSES FOR PLEASURE OR DISPLAY DURING A PERIOD OF ACUTE PUBLIC WANT OR EMERGENCY MAY BE STOPPED BY ORDER OF THE COURTS AT THE INSTANCE OF ANY GOVERNMENT OR PRIVATE CHARITABLE INSTITUTION.